<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Wolfgang&#039;s blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog</link>
	<description>Just another weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:39:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mozilla based web authoring applications by OpenSUSE and SUSE: Shutdown, Removals, and New Software for Macs &#124; Techrights</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/2012/01/08/mozilla-based-web-authoring-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-47666</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenSUSE and SUSE: Shutdown, Removals, and New Software for Macs &#124; Techrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/?p=192#comment-47666</guid>
		<description>[...] the old days (around SuSE 8.1, the distribution came with some neat Web development tools. Wolfgang writes about one of them:  I’m not a web designer really but I happen to be kind of responsible for packaging two web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the old days (around SuSE 8.1, the distribution came with some neat Web development tools. Wolfgang writes about one of them:  I’m not a web designer really but I happen to be kind of responsible for packaging two web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evergreen project status update by Sascha</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/2011/11/18/evergreen-project-status-update/comment-page-1/#comment-47646</link>
		<dc:creator>Sascha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/?p=185#comment-47646</guid>
		<description>I am still using openSUSE 11.1 (besides openSUSE 12.1) and, therefore, I am very thankful for what you have done.
On the mailing-list there was a talk about a meeting with regard to a possible future for openSUSE 11.1 Evergreen.
Did this meeting happen?
Maybe it is possible to find a little group of people who has the time to maintain openSUSE 11.1 or parts of it (e.g. the non-GUI ones) also in 2012.
Libre Office, KDE3, Mozilla products (&quot;your&quot; mozilla OBS repo), Wine and Kernel 2.6.32 still work. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still using openSUSE 11.1 (besides openSUSE 12.1) and, therefore, I am very thankful for what you have done.<br />
On the mailing-list there was a talk about a meeting with regard to a possible future for openSUSE 11.1 Evergreen.<br />
Did this meeting happen?<br />
Maybe it is possible to find a little group of people who has the time to maintain openSUSE 11.1 or parts of it (e.g. the non-GUI ones) also in 2012.<br />
Libre Office, KDE3, Mozilla products (&#8220;your&#8221; mozilla OBS repo), Wine and Kernel 2.6.32 still work. <img src='http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evergreen project status update by jospoortvliet</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/2011/11/18/evergreen-project-status-update/comment-page-1/#comment-47635</link>
		<dc:creator>jospoortvliet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/?p=185#comment-47635</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with Peter, I think you did an outstanding job. 11.1 maintenance for 3 years is quite nice for a community distribution indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with Peter, I think you did an outstanding job. 11.1 maintenance for 3 years is quite nice for a community distribution indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evergreen project status update by Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/2011/11/18/evergreen-project-status-update/comment-page-1/#comment-47632</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/?p=185#comment-47632</guid>
		<description>openSUSE 11.1 will be the first LTS openSUSE desktop release ever, maintained for three years, and you did it. What an outstanding work!
In my opinion, a LTS release is something that Suse/openSUSE should do regularly.
You proved that it is possible, even with very limited manpower, i.e. mostly one maintainer (!).
So it is a huge success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>openSUSE 11.1 will be the first LTS openSUSE desktop release ever, maintained for three years, and you did it. What an outstanding work!<br />
In my opinion, a LTS release is something that Suse/openSUSE should do regularly.<br />
You proved that it is possible, even with very limited manpower, i.e. mostly one maintainer (!).<br />
So it is a huge success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on on Macaw, Aurora, and Miramar by cartman</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/2011/04/19/on-macaw-aurora-and-miramar/comment-page-1/#comment-47571</link>
		<dc:creator>cartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/?p=180#comment-47571</guid>
		<description>Was waiting for the Miramar, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was waiting for the Miramar, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on openSUSE project &#8220;Evergreen&#8221; by wolfgang</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/2011/01/03/opensuse-project-evergreen/comment-page-1/#comment-46010</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfgang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/?p=169#comment-46010</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not intended but it cannot be avoided either. OBS needs to support it for us. I got a statement back in January that it might be possible to enable that for us but it didn&#039;t happen yet. I need to recheck with the OBS guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not intended but it cannot be avoided either. OBS needs to support it for us. I got a statement back in January that it might be possible to enable that for us but it didn&#8217;t happen yet. I need to recheck with the OBS guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on openSUSE project &#8220;Evergreen&#8221; by Ano Nym</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/2011/01/03/opensuse-project-evergreen/comment-page-1/#comment-46009</link>
		<dc:creator>Ano Nym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/?p=169#comment-46009</guid>
		<description>Is it intended that previous RPMs are removed from Evergreen when new versions are available? On my system MozillaFirefox-3.6.15-3.1.x86_64.rpm has just been deleted when MozillaFirefox-3.6.16-4.1.i586.rpm is beeing downloaded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it intended that previous RPMs are removed from Evergreen when new versions are available? On my system MozillaFirefox-3.6.15-3.1.x86_64.rpm has just been deleted when MozillaFirefox-3.6.16-4.1.i586.rpm is beeing downloaded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on openSUSE project &#8220;Evergreen&#8221; by Zombie Lizards! Evergreen brings 11.1 back from the dead &#124; Daringsearch</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/2011/01/03/opensuse-project-evergreen/comment-page-1/#comment-44983</link>
		<dc:creator>Zombie Lizards! Evergreen brings 11.1 back from the dead &#124; Daringsearch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 07:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/?p=169#comment-44983</guid>
		<description>[...] extending support for openSUSE 11.1 by the openSUSE community. Shortly after the new year, openSUSE project Evergreen was born, a community-powered attempt at extending long-term support for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] extending support for openSUSE 11.1 by the openSUSE community. Shortly after the new year, openSUSE project Evergreen was born, a community-powered attempt at extending long-term support for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on community powered long term support for openSUSE? by Zombie Lizards! Evergreen brings 11.1 back from the dead &#124; Daringsearch</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/2010/11/30/community-powered-long-term-support-for-opensuse/comment-page-1/#comment-44981</link>
		<dc:creator>Zombie Lizards! Evergreen brings 11.1 back from the dead &#124; Daringsearch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 07:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/?p=161#comment-44981</guid>
		<description>[...] the deadline of December 31st came, there was already talk about extending support for openSUSE 11.1 by the openSUSE community. Shortly after the new year, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the deadline of December 31st came, there was already talk about extending support for openSUSE 11.1 by the openSUSE community. Shortly after the new year, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Samsung Galaxy S (I9000) vs. HTC Desire by barca96</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/2010/09/01/samsung-galaxy-s-i9000-vs-htc-desire/comment-page-1/#comment-44134</link>
		<dc:creator>barca96</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenauer.org/blog/?p=148#comment-44134</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I like your arguments.
I agree with you.
The only thing that&#039;s putting me off the Galaxy is the lack of LED. Without it, it&#039;s basically impossible to catch a decent photo or record a video at night. sigh.

However, the downside of the Desire is the screen.

I don&#039;t know which one is more useful. A LED or better screen? Can you advice me?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I like your arguments.<br />
I agree with you.<br />
The only thing that&#8217;s putting me off the Galaxy is the lack of LED. Without it, it&#8217;s basically impossible to catch a decent photo or record a video at night. sigh.</p>
<p>However, the downside of the Desire is the screen.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know which one is more useful. A LED or better screen? Can you advice me?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

